- Floral print blue & lilac sleeveless shirt: charity shop
- Bright blue cardigan: charity shop
- Cream high waisted laura ashley trousers: charity shop
- Black converse low-tops
- Pearl & chain necklace: handmade
- Teal gemstone ring: gem shop in devon
- Canvas tote bag: gift from friend at a festival
- Black bag with gold straps: refashioned from a vintage jacket
Those astute may have noticed I omitted day six in the photo documentation. Basically, Monday and Tuesday centered around the same outfit because, as mentioned, I was in Bristol. I was on foot exploring the town for the majority of the time and needed to pack light. Hopefully, that makes it seem less disgusting! I did change my shirt (the other was the pink number as seen in old photo) but wearing the same clothes two days in a row is not something I make a habit of.
Anyway, not that you're asking, but I had a pretty awesome time! Found some cool spots, walked a lot, went to a few charity shops, visited several coffee shops and cafes, had some interesting conversations and err, yeah, I'm now looking forward to moving there in... eeep... 10 days. My friend jokingly mocked me for having 'granny style' with my fondness for a floral print and old clothes. I've been told I dress 'old' before, so I don't take it offensively, but I have to say, I found it very interesting. Why can clothes be classed as 'old'? Other than the obvious, that mine are, a lot of the time, secondhand. If you like fashion, does that mean only dressing in modern styles can make you youthful? If you subscribe to the idea that fashion goes round in circles, surely everything classed as contemporary is old anyway? Simply put, you can't just disregard something because it's 'old'. And then we get to the whole issue of, why does 'old' imply 'bad' anyway? As an object, can an article of clothing on it's own have a connotation beyond simply a physical description of it? Is it not dependent upon the wearer or the particular context, that meaning can be attributed? If not, can you thereby even take designs out of their context to reinvent them for another purpose?
My friend probably did not envisage quite how much that little comment of his would trigger in thought! He later asked me if when I was old, I would "start dressing really young". I laughed and said 'Yeah, because that's my aim in life. To mess with everyone's minds." Truthfully, I don't know how I'll dress when I'm 'old'. I'm not there yet.
- 'Victory' knitted jumper: handmade, pattern from v&a
- Plain white t-shirt (hidden): dorothy perkins
- Light blue jeans: refashioned, originally from charity shop
- Red lace knit ankle socks: topshop
- Electric blue doc martens: early mornings vintage on etsy
- Silver celtic style ring: gift
For today, it's much better on the handmade front, I think you'll agree! Firstly, do you recall, back in January, I posted about a jumper I was working on? One that I have been working on for god knows how long? Well, yes, I finally managed to finish it. I am quite possibly one of the slowest knitters ever.
This is really, the first jumper I've knitted. It turned out badly though. Basically, when I went to do this blocking malarky (still don't quite understand blocking) it stretched out loads and now it's far too loose. Usually, with a handmade piece, I hand-wash them instead of putting them in the machine, but I'm actually contemplating putting it through with the hopes of it shrinking a bit. But then I don't know if it'll even work because I think the yarn is an acrylic/wool blend rather than pure wool. Ack! Seasoned knitters, do you have any ideas?
Now, onto the actual outfit. So this is where I make baby steps to attempt to subvert ideas about race and patriotism and identity. As someone who has never particularly been concerned with race (in that I, quite simply, don't see someone as the colour of their skin), lately it seems like I've been surrounded so much by conversations and blog posts on race. For example, this very interesting Fashion for Writers article on Dior & Race, numerous articles on Threadbared, the odd post on A l'allure Garçonnière and then there are dedicated blogs like, Racialicious. That's not mentioning how many other random places I've read or talked about it. I don't intend to make this into very hefty political talk, but what clothes signify is important. No matter how much people quaff with "it's just fashion", it's never as freaking simple as that. Clothes can mean something and can be identifiers to different things, including race, so it is important to consider.
First up, the docs. Ages ago, when docs started becoming trendy (yes, sometimes I bow into trends), I read on some blog about how skinheads didn't start out as being the 'racists' that the subculture is often associated with now. I'd never heard of skins before reading the post (I can't remember where it was sorry!) so truthfully, knowing that, means I don't associate skinheads with racism. Yet, having spoken to one/two friends, I suspect a larger majority do. Actually, my friend Bethan even tweeted that idea. SO my question is, if docs are linked to skins, and skins to racism, and racism against people err... like me, what does it mean by me wearing them? Going back to what I wrote earlier about objects and connotations, can I even take them out of context? Am I condoning racism against err... myself? Or, by wearing them, am I able to sort of putting two fingers up to those ideals? Simply because of my genetics.
Docs, I admit, aren't limited to skins. According to Put This On, they have roots in "mods, punks, skins and grunge" so truthfully, they could link to any one of these subcultures. And obviously, I am not actually a skinhead. So, is this attempted subversion even able to work?
What about when combined with this particular jumper? And even, to an extent, wearing jeans and a white t-shirt underneath. That links to the US, where race, I suspect is a larger issue. For my jumper, I'd never considered it patriotism when I picked the colours - I full-on copied the pattern because I like navy, red & white as a combination and thought no further than that... this was certainly before I started considering context more. But when I went to a knitting group once, another lady commented on how it was 'very patriotic' and considering that the pattern itself comes from 1940s wartime Britain, is it any wonder that it's patriotic?! Though, I admit, the comment worried me. Whilst I would certainly consider myself British, I am not inclined toward overt displays of patriotism. And this one is rather in your face isn't it?
But then, because I so obviously belong to a minority group, is what I am attempting to say only able to work because it's on me? Is it just saying that I'm a Brit-o-phile? Then, if you saw a white British person wearing this, would you think them a Brit-o-phile? In love with this country? Patriot? Racist?!
Many many questions and many many issues. Perhaps it serves to highlight the importance of clothing and the messages they communicate. Or else, just a the rough context for this outfit. On the subject of race, becoming more aware of racial issues has made me frustrated and occasionally, confused on how to act/think. I think it's the same for everyone because it is a sticky topic. I get frustrated thinking how, when I'm out in the world, I'm not just representing myself, apparently I'm representing every other person belonging to my racial group. And likewise, when some people see me, they don't just see me as me or 'some girl', I'm most obviously 'a little Indian/Asian girl' (little referring to my height, which is actually 5'3" - 5'4"... you be the judge of 'little') and place all sorts of stereotypes from that onto me. Then after people get to know me, I've been told I 'act white' and I'm an 'honorary white girl' (I'm totally taking those two out of context, but the sentiments stand) as if the way people are can only apply to one particular racial group. Once, in a uni interview, I was asked if I was "a typical Asian" (I'm not going to reveal which uni that was, but it was by far the weirdest interview I had) and I think I bumbled about the question a bit baffled, when what I really wanted to say was "what the fuck constitutes being 'typical'?!" Maybe if I'd just said it, I would've got in eh? Now I've had time to think about it, certainly, if you're stereotyping people, I am not "typical", but there are parts which will not be completely atypical either. Race isn't something I choose. In short, every person is the combination of everything they have been exposed to thus far in life and that includes cultural heritage.
And now I shall hesitantly click publish and apprehensively let your views fly in on anything I have talked about in this post. Race, clothing contexts and knitting tips... it has been a varied post!























